Marketing Deal Offers

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 19 November 2010

More on Marketo Financials: Despite Past Losses, Prospects Are Bright

Posted on 05:20 by Unknown
Summary: Public data gives some insights into Marketo's financial history and prospects. Despite past losses, the company is in a strong position to continue to compete aggressively. (Note: as Marketo has commented below, this article is based on my own analysis and was written without access to Marketo's actual financial information.)

Here’s a bit more on this week's $25 million investment in Marketo: a piece in VentureWire quotes revenue for Markteo as $4.5 million for 2009 and "triple that" ($13.5 million) for 2010. This is the first time I've seen published revenue figures for the company. They allow for some interesting analysis.

Data I've collected over the years shows that Marketo had about 120 clients at the start of 2009, 325 at the start of 2010, and should end 2010 with about 800. Doing a bit of math, this yields average counts of 222 for 2009 and 562 for 2010, which in turn shows average revenue per client of $20,000 per year or $1,700 per month in 2009 and $24,000 or $2,000 per month in 2010. The table below throws in a reasonable guess for 2008 as well.

Given that Marketo’s list prices start at $2,000 per month for the smallest implementation of its full-featured edition, this is pretty firm evidence that the company has indeed been aggressively discounting its system – as competitors have long stated.

(Some competitors have also said that Marketo's reported client counts are cumulative new clients, without reductions for attrition. If so, the revenue per active client would actually be a bit higher than I've calculated here. But Marketo itself says the reported figures are indeed active clients and I've no basis to doubt them. The following analysis wouldn't change much either way.)

If you’ll accept a bit more speculation, we can even estimate the size of those discounts. That same VentureWire article quotes Marketo’s current headcount as 130 employees, compared with half that number at the start of the year. Assume there were 70 at the start of 2010 (which matches my own data) and will be 140 by year-end, for an average of 105. My records suggest that the headcount at the start of the 2009 was around 35, so the average headcount for that year was about 52.

Let’s assume a "normal" revenue of $200,000 per employee, which is about typical for software companies (and matches published figures for Marketo competitors Aprimo and Unica). That means Marketo revenues without discounting “should” have been about $10.4 million in 2009 and $21 million in 2010. Compared with actual revenues, this shows 2009 revenue was about 43% of the “normal” price ($4.5 million actual vs. $10.4 million expected) and 2010 revenue at about 64% ($13.5 million vs. $21 million).

So the good news for Marketo’s new investors is that Marketo has been discounting less (although there’s an alternative explanation that we’ll get to in a minute). The bad news is they have quite a way to go before they’re selling at full price.

We can use the same data to estimate Marketo’s burn rate. Costs are likely to be very close to the same $200,000 per employee (this includes everything, not just salary). My records suggest the company had about 25 average employees in 2008, for $5 million in expenses. Marketo was founded in late 2005, so let’s figure it averaged 10 employees during the previous two years, and that they cost only $150,000 because the early stage doesn’t involve marketing costs. This adds another $3 million. That gives a cumulative investment of $39.4 million.

We already know revenue for 2009 and 2010 will be about $18 million. The company started selling in late February 2008 and my records show it ended that year with 120 clients. Assume the equivalent of 50 annual clients at $15,000 and you get 2008 revenue of $750,000, for $18.75 million total. That leaves a gap of $20.65 million between life-to-date costs vs. revenues.
This nicely matches the “approximately $20 million” investment to date that Marketo CEO Phil Fernandez reportedin his own blog post on the new funding.

Now you can see why Marketo needed more money: its losses are actually growing despite having more customers and improved pricing. It lost nearly $16,000 for each new client last year ($7.5 million loss on 475 new clients). At that rate, even a modest increase in the number of new clients would have burned through nearly all of the company’s remaining $12 million within one year.

This isn’t just a matter of scale. It’s true that a start-up has to spread its fixed costs over a small number of clients, yielding a high cost per client during the early stages. Marketo shows this effect: the number of clients per employee has grown started at 3.4 at the end of 2008 and dropped to 5.7 at the end of 2010. This is the alternative to discounting as an explanation for those ratios of "normal" to actual revenue (remember: “normal” revenue based on number of employees).

But the client/employee ratio can’t improve indefinitely. Many costs are not fixed: staffing for customer support, marketing, sales and administrative functions will all increase as clients are added. To get some idea of Marketo's variable costs, compare the change in employees with the change in clients. This is improving more slowly:

And here’s the problem: at 1 new employee for every 6.8 clients, Marketo is adding $200,000 in cost for just $163,000 in revenue (=6.8 x $24,000 / client). It truly does lose money on each new customer. You can’t grow your way out of that.

So what happens now? Let’s assume Marketo gets a bit more efficient and the new clients to new employee ratio eventually tops out at a relatively optimistic 8. At a cost of $200,000 per employee, those clients have to generate $25,000 in revenue for Marketo just to cover the increased expense. This is just a bit higher than the current $24,000 per client, so it seems pretty doable. But it leaves the existing $7.5 million annual loss in place forever.

In other words, Marketo must substantially increase revenue per client to become profitable. (In theory, Marketo could also cut costs. But the main controllable cost is sales and marketing, and incremental cost per sale is likely to rise as the company enters new markets and faces stiffer competition while pushing for continued growth. So higher revenue is the only real option.)

Revenue per client can be increased through higher prices, new products, and/or bigger clients. Pricing will be constrained by competition, although Marketo could probably discount a bit less. This leaves new products and bigger clients. Those are exactly the areas that Marketo is now pursuing through add-ons such as Revenue Cycle Analytics and Sales Insight, and enhancements for large companies in its Enterprise Edition. So, in my humble opinion, they're doing exactly the right things.

Some back-of-envelope calculations confirm that revenue per client is by far the most important variable in Marketo’s financial future. The following tables use some reasonable assumptions about growth in clients and clients per employee; take my word for it that the results don’t change much if you modify these. But results change hugely depending on what happens to revenue per client: losses continue indefinitely if it remains at the current $24,000 per year; they continue for two years and total $10 million if it increases at 10% per year; and they end after one year and $4.4 million if it grows at 20% per year. Bear in mind that revenue per customer did grow 20% from 2009 to 2010 ($20,000 to $24,000). So I’d expect it to continue rising sharply as Marketo firms up its pricing and starts acquiring larger clients.


Indeed, these figures raise the unexpected (to me) question of whether $25 million in funding is more than Marketo will need. I’d guess the company’s management and current investors were careful not to dilute their equity any more than necessary, so I think they’re planning some heavy investments that are not factored into my assumptions. In fact, the company has said as much: the VentureWire piece quotes Fernandez as stating the new funds will be used for additional sales and marketing staff, to open offices abroad, to integrate with other vendors and launch vertical services in sectors like health care and financial services.

I also expect continued aggressive pricing (perhaps more selectively than in the past) and maybe some acquisitions. It's possible that Marketo will also expand its own professional services staff, since clients definitely need help with adoption. But that would conflict with its existing channel partners so it would need to move carefully.

What does it all mean? Here are my conclusions:

- Marketo's losses reflect a conscious strategy to grow quickly through aggressive pricing. There is no fundamental problem with its cost structure: company could be profitable fairly quickly if it decided to slow down and raise prices.

- Marketo's future lies in the middle and upper tiers of the market. Its pressing financial need is to raise revenue per client, which will lead it away from the low-cost, bitterly competitive market serving very small businesses.

- The new funding will support an expanded marketing and product push. Competing with Marketo in its target segments is going to be a challenge indeed.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in demand generation marketing automation, marketing software, marketo | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • eBay Offers $2.4 Billion for GSI Commerce: More Support for Marketing Automation
    eBay ’s $2.4 billion offer for e-commerce services giant GSI Commerce has been described largely in terms of helping eBay to compete with ...
  • Infer Keeps It Simple: B2B Lead Scores and Nothing Else
    I’ve nearly finished gathering information from vendors for my new study on Customer Data Platform systems and have started to look for patt...
  • NICE Buys Causata to Extend Its Customer Experience Management Position
    So, there I was around 7:30 Eastern time this morning, sending out reminder notices to vendors I need to interview for an upcoming report on...
  • thinkAnalytics Helps Marketers Optimize Customer Treatments
    Summary: thinkAnalytics provides a robust decision engine to help make optimal recommendations across channels. Too bad more people don...
  • Selligent Brings a New B2C Marketing Automation Option to the U.S.
    I’m writing this post on my old DOS-based WordPerfect software, to get in the proper mood for discussing business-to-consumer marketing auto...
  • So Many Measures, So Little Time
    I’ve been collating lists of marketing performance metrics from different sources, which is exactly as much fun as it sounds. One result th...
  • 4 Marketing Tech Trends To Watch in 2014
    I'm not a big fan of year-end summaries and forecasts, mostly because I produce summaries and forecasts all year round.  But I pulled to...
  • Marketo Raises Another $50 Million: Where Does the Money Go?
    Marketo this morning announced a new $50 million funding round, almost exactly one year to the day after raising $25 million in November 2...
  • James Taylor on His New Book
    A few months ago, James Taylor of Fair Isaac asked me to look over a proof of Smart (Enough) Systems , a book he has co-written with indust...
  • Vocus Marketing Suite: Still Mostly Social But Marketing Automation is On the Way
    If you’ve heard of Vocus at all, it’s probably as vendor serving public relations professionals. Its core offerings include a huge databas...

Categories

  • [x+1]
  • 1010Data
  • 2009 trends
  • 2010 predictions
  • 2011 predictions
  • 2013 marketing automation revenues
  • 2014 predictions
  • account data in marketing systems
  • acquisitions
  • acquistions
  • act-on software
  • active conversion
  • activeconversion
  • acxiom
  • ad agencies
  • ad servers
  • adam needles
  • adobe
  • adometry
  • advertising effectiveness
  • advocate management
  • affiliate marketing
  • agilone
  • aida model
  • aimatch
  • algorithmic attribution
  • alterian
  • analysis systems
  • analytical database
  • analytical databases
  • analytical systems
  • analytics tools
  • app exchange
  • app marketplace
  • application design
  • aprimo
  • are
  • artificial intelligence
  • ascend2
  • asset management
  • assetlink
  • atg
  • attribution analysis
  • attribution models
  • automated decisions
  • automated dialog
  • automated modeling
  • autonomy
  • b2b demand generation
  • b2b demand generation systems
  • b2b email marketing benchmarks
  • b2b lead scoring
  • b2b marketing
  • b2b marketing automation
  • b2b marketing automation industry consolidation
  • b2b marketing automation industry growth rate
  • b2b marketing automation revenues
  • b2b marketing automation systems
  • b2b marketing automation vendor rankings
  • b2b marketing data
  • b2b marketing industry consolidation
  • b2b marketing strategy
  • b2b marketing system comparison
  • b2c marketing automation
  • b2c marketing automation vendors
  • balanced scorecard
  • balihoo
  • barriers to marketing success
  • barry devlin
  • beanstalk data
  • behavior detection
  • behavior identification
  • behavior targeting
  • behavioral data
  • behavioral targeting
  • big data
  • birst
  • bislr
  • blogging software
  • brand experience
  • brand marketing
  • business intelligence
  • business intelligence software
  • business intelligence systems
  • business marketing
  • businses case
  • callidus
  • campaign flow
  • campaign management
  • campaign management software
  • causata
  • cdi
  • cdp
  • channel management
  • channel marketing
  • channel partner management
  • chordiant
  • cio priorities
  • clickdimensions
  • clicksquared
  • clientxclient
  • cloud computing
  • cmo surveys
  • cms
  • collaboration software
  • column data store
  • column-oriented database
  • columnar database
  • community management
  • compare marketing automation vendors
  • compiled data
  • complex event processing
  • consumer marketing
  • contact center systems
  • content aggregation
  • content distribution
  • content grazing
  • content management
  • content marketing
  • content matrix
  • content recommendations
  • content selections
  • content syndication
  • context automation
  • conversen
  • coremetrics
  • crm
  • crm integration
  • CRM lead scores
  • crm software
  • crm systems
  • crmevolution
  • cross-channel marketing
  • crowd sourcing
  • custom content
  • custom media
  • customer database
  • customer analysis
  • customer data
  • customer data integration
  • customer data management
  • customer data platform
  • customer data platforms
  • customer data quality
  • customer data warehouse
  • customer database
  • customer experience
  • customer experience management
  • customer experience matrix
  • customer information
  • customer management
  • customer management software
  • customer management systems
  • customer metrics
  • customer relationship management
  • customer satisfaction
  • customer success
  • customer support
  • cxc matrix
  • dashboards
  • data analysis
  • data cleaning
  • data cleansing
  • data enhancement
  • data integration
  • data loading
  • data mining
  • data mining and terrorism
  • data quality
  • data transformation tools
  • data visualization
  • data warehouse
  • database management
  • database marketing
  • database marketing systems
  • database technology
  • dataflux
  • datallegro
  • datamentors
  • david raab
  • david raab webinar
  • david raab whitepaper
  • day software
  • decision engiens
  • decision engines
  • decision management
  • decision science
  • dell
  • demand generation
  • demand generation implementation
  • demand generation industry
  • demand generation industry growth rate
  • demand generation industry size
  • demand generation industry trends
  • demand generation marketbright
  • demand generation marketing automation
  • demand generation software
  • demand generation software revenues
  • demand generation systems
  • demand generation vendors
  • demandforce
  • digiday
  • digital marketing
  • digital marketing systems
  • digital messaging
  • distributed marketing
  • dmp
  • dreamforce
  • dreamforce 2012
  • dynamic content
  • ease of use
  • ebay
  • eglue
  • eloqua
  • eloqua10
  • elqoua ipo
  • email
  • email marketing
  • email service providers
  • engagement engine
  • enteprise marketing management
  • enterprise decision management
  • enterprise marketing management
  • enterprise software
  • entiera
  • epiphany
  • ETL
  • eTrigue
  • event detection
  • event stream processing
  • event-based marketing
  • exacttarget
  • facebook
  • feature checklists
  • flow charts
  • fractional attribution
  • freemium
  • future of marketing automation
  • g2crowd
  • gainsight
  • Genius.com
  • genoo
  • geotargeting
  • gleanster
  • governance
  • grosocial
  • gsi commerce
  • high performance analytics
  • hiring consultants
  • hosted software
  • hosted systems
  • hubspot
  • ibm
  • impact of internet on selling
  • importance of sales execution
  • in-memory database
  • in-site search
  • inbound marketing
  • industry consolidation
  • industry growth rate
  • industry size
  • industry trends
  • influitive
  • infor
  • information cards
  • infusioncon 2013
  • infusionsoft
  • innovation
  • integrated customer management
  • integrated marketing management
  • integrated marketing management systems
  • integrated marketing systems
  • integrated systems
  • intent measurement
  • interaction advisor
  • interaction management
  • interestbase
  • interwoven
  • intuit
  • IP address lookup
  • jbara
  • jesubi
  • king fish media
  • kwanzoo
  • kxen
  • kynetx
  • large company marketing automation
  • last click attribution
  • lead capture
  • lead generation
  • lead management
  • lead management software
  • lead management systems
  • lead managment
  • lead ranking
  • lead scoring
  • lead scoring models
  • leadforce1
  • leadformix
  • leading marketing automation systems
  • leadlander
  • leadlife
  • leadmd
  • leftbrain dga
  • lifecycle analysis
  • lifecycle reporting
  • lifetime value
  • lifetime value model
  • local marketing automation
  • loopfuse
  • low cost marketing software
  • low-cost marketing software
  • loyalty systems
  • lyzasoft
  • makesbridge
  • manticore technology
  • mapreduce
  • market consolidation
  • market software
  • market2lead
  • marketbight
  • marketbright
  • marketgenius
  • marketing analysis
  • marketing analytics
  • marketing and sales integration
  • marketing automation
  • marketing automation adoption
  • marketing automation benefits
  • marketing automation consolidation
  • marketing automation cost
  • marketing automation deployment
  • marketing automation features
  • marketing automation industry
  • marketing automation industry growth rate
  • marketing automation industry trends
  • marketing automation market share
  • marketing automation market size
  • marketing automation maturity model
  • marketing automation net promoter score. marketing automation effectiveness
  • marketing automation pricing
  • marketing automation software
  • marketing automation software evaluation
  • marketing automation success factors
  • marketing automation system deployment
  • marketing automation system evaluation
  • marketing automation system features
  • marketing automation system selection
  • marketing automation system usage
  • marketing automation systems
  • marketing automation trends
  • marketing automation user satisfaction
  • marketing automation vendor financials
  • marketing automation vendor selection
  • marketing automation vendor strategies
  • marketing automion
  • marketing best practices
  • marketing cloud
  • marketing content
  • marketing data
  • marketing data management
  • marketing database
  • marketing database management
  • marketing education
  • marketing execution
  • marketing funnel
  • marketing integration
  • marketing lead stages
  • marketing management
  • marketing measurement
  • marketing mix models
  • marketing operating system
  • marketing operations
  • marketing optimization
  • marketing performance
  • marketing performance measurement
  • marketing platforms
  • marketing priorities
  • marketing process
  • marketing process optimization
  • marketing resource management
  • marketing return on investment
  • marketing ROI
  • marketing sales alignment
  • marketing service providers
  • marketing services
  • marketing services providers
  • marketing skills gap
  • marketing software
  • marketing software evaluation
  • marketing software industry trends
  • marketing software product reviews
  • marketing software selection
  • marketing software trends
  • marketing softwware
  • marketing suites
  • marketing system architecture
  • marketing system evaluation
  • marketing system ROI
  • marketing system selection
  • marketing systems
  • marketing technology
  • marketing tests
  • marketing tips
  • marketing to sales alignment
  • marketing training
  • marketing trends
  • marketing-sales integration
  • marketingpilot
  • marketo
  • marketo funding
  • marketo ipo
  • master data management
  • matching
  • maturity model
  • meaning based marketing
  • media mix models
  • message customization
  • metrics
  • micro-business marketing software
  • microsoft
  • microsoft dynamics crm
  • mid-tier marketing systems
  • mindmatrix
  • mintigo
  • mma
  • mobile marketing
  • mpm toolkit
  • multi-channel marketing
  • multi-language marketing
  • multivariate testing
  • natural language processing
  • neolane
  • net promoter score
  • network link analysis
  • next best action
  • nice systems
  • nimble crm
  • number of clients
  • nurture programs
  • officeautopilot
  • omnichannel marketing
  • omniture
  • on-demand
  • on-demand business intelligence
  • on-demand software
  • on-premise software
  • online advertising
  • online advertising optimization
  • online analytics
  • online marketing
  • open source bi
  • open source software
  • optimization
  • optimove
  • oracle
  • paraccel
  • pardot
  • pardot acquisition
  • partner relationship management
  • pay per click
  • pay per response
  • pedowitz group
  • pegasystems
  • performable
  • performance marketing
  • personalization
  • pitney bowes
  • portrait software
  • predictive analytics
  • predictive lead scoring
  • predictive modeling
  • privacy
  • prospect database
  • prospecting
  • qliktech
  • qlikview
  • qlikview price
  • raab guide
  • raab report
  • raab survey
  • Raab VEST
  • Raab VEST report
  • raab webinar
  • reachedge
  • reachforce
  • real time decision management
  • real time interaction management
  • real-time decisions
  • real-time interaction management
  • realtime decisions
  • recommendation engines
  • relationship analysis
  • reporting software
  • request for proposal
  • reseller marketing automation
  • response attribution
  • revenue attribution
  • revenue generation
  • revenue performance management
  • rfm scores
  • rightnow
  • rightwave
  • roi reporting
  • role of experts
  • rule-based systems
  • saas software
  • saffron technology
  • sales automation
  • sales best practices
  • sales enablement
  • sales force automation
  • sales funnel
  • sales lead management association
  • sales leads
  • sales process
  • sales prospecting
  • salesforce acquires exacttarget
  • salesforce.com
  • salesgenius
  • sap
  • sas
  • score cards
  • search engine optimization
  • search engines
  • self-optimizing systems
  • selligent
  • semantic analysis
  • semantic analytics
  • sentiment analysis
  • service oriented architecture
  • setlogik
  • setlogik acquisition
  • silverpop
  • silverpop engage
  • silverpop engage b2b
  • simulation
  • sisense prismcubed
  • sitecore
  • small business marketing
  • small business software
  • smarter commerce
  • smartfocus
  • soa
  • social campaign management
  • social crm
  • social marketing
  • social marketing automation
  • social marketing management
  • social media
  • social media marketing
  • social media measurement
  • social media monitoring
  • social media roi
  • social network data
  • software as a service
  • software costs
  • software deployment
  • software evaluation
  • software satisfaction
  • software selection
  • software usability
  • software usability measurement
  • Spredfast
  • stage-based measurement
  • state-based systems
  • surveillance technology
  • sweet suite
  • swyft
  • sybase iq
  • system deployment
  • system design
  • system implementation
  • system requirements
  • system selection
  • tableau software
  • technology infrastructure
  • techrigy
  • Tenbase
  • teradata
  • test design
  • text analysis
  • training
  • treehouse international
  • trigger marketing
  • twitter
  • unica
  • universal behaviors
  • unstructured data
  • usability assessment
  • user interface
  • vendor comparison
  • vendor evaluation
  • vendor evaluation comparison
  • vendor rankings
  • vendor selection
  • vendor services
  • venntive
  • vertica
  • visualiq
  • vocus
  • vtrenz
  • web analytics
  • web contact management
  • Web content management
  • web data analysis
  • web marketing
  • web personalization
  • Web site design
  • whatsnexx
  • woopra
  • youcalc
  • zoho
  • zoomix

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (55)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2012 (56)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2011 (74)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ▼  2010 (75)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ▼  November (9)
      • Treehouse Interactive Refines Its Features and Tar...
      • Alterian Alchemy Knits Together Marketing Components
      • More on Marketo Financials: Despite Past Losses, P...
      • LoopFuse Captures More Web Traffic Data
      • Why Put Another $25 Million Into Marketo?
      • Eloqua10 Offers a Much-Improved Interface and Reve...
      • Rapid Insight Provides Low-Cost Options for Deskto...
      • Right On Interactive Offers Lifecycle Reporting
      • Oracle Buys ATG: Bad News for Marketing Automation?
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2009 (96)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (11)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2008 (59)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2007 (84)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (16)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (20)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile