Marketing Deal Offers

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 16 April 2009

Lyzasoft: Independence for Analysts and Maybe Some Light on Shadow IT

Posted on 13:03 by Unknown
Long-time readers of this blog know that I have a deep fondness for QlikView as a tool that lets business analysts do work that would otherwise require IT support. QlikView has a very fast, scalable database and excellent tools to create reports and graphs. But quite a few other systems offer at least one of these.*

What really sets QlikView apart is its scripting language, which lets analysts build processing streams to combine and transform multiple data sources. Although QlikView is far from comparable with enterprise-class data integration tools like Informatica, its scripts allow sophisticated data preparation that is vastly too complex to repeat regularly in Excel. (See my post What Makes QlikTech So Good for more on this.)

Lyzasoft Lyza is the first product I’ve seen that might give QlikView a serious run for its money. Lyza doesn’t have scripts, but users can achieve similar goals by building step-by-step process flows to merge and transform multiple data sources. The flows support different kinds of joins and Excel-style formulas, including if statements and comparisons to adjacent rows. This gives Lyza enough power to do most of the manipulations an analyst would want in cleaning and extending a data set.

Lyza also has the unique and important advantage of letting users view the actual data at every step in the flow, the way they’d see rows on a spreadsheet. This makes it vastly easier to build a flow that does what you want. The flows can also produce reports, including tables and different kinds of graphs, which would typically be the final result of an analysis project.

All of that is quite impressive and makes for a beautiful demonstration. But plenty of systems can do cool things on small volumes of data – basically, they throw the data into memory and go nuts. Everything about Lyza, from its cartoonish logo to its desktop-only deployment to the online store selling at a sub-$1,000 price point, led me to expect the same. I figured this would be another nice tool for little data sets – which to me means 50,000 to 100,000 rows – and nothing more.

But it seems that’s not the case. Lyzasoft CEO Scott Davis tells me the system regularly runs data sets with tens of millions of rows and the biggest he’s used is 591 million rows and around 7.5-8 GB.

A good part of the trick is that Lyza is NOT an in-memory database. This means it’s not bound by the workstation’s memory limits. Instead, Lyza uses a columnar structure with indexes on non-numeric fields. This lets it read required data from the disk very quickly. Davis also said that in practice most users either summarize or sample very large data sets early in their data flows to get down to more manageable volumes.

Summarizing the data seems a lot like cheating when you’re talking about scalability, so that didn’t leave me very convinced. But you can download a free 30 day trial of Lyza, which let me test it myself.

Bottom line: my embarrassingly ancient desktop (2.8 GHz CPU, 2 GB RAM, Windows XP) loaded a 400 MB CSV file with about 430,000 rows in just over 6 minutes. That’s somewhat painful, but it does suggest you could load 4 GB in an hour – a practical if not exactly desirable period. The real issue is that each subsequent step could take similar amounts of time: copying my 400 MB set to a second step took a little over 2 minutes and, more worrisome, subsequent filters took the same 2 minutes even though they reduced the record count to 85,000 then 7,000 then 50. This means a complete processing flow on a large data set could run for hours.

Still, a typical real-world scenario would be to do development work on small samples, and then only run a really big flow once you knew you had it right. So even the load time for subsequent steps is not necessarily a show-stopper.

Better news is that rerunning an existing filter with slightly different criteria took just a few seconds, and even rerunning the existing flow from the start was much faster than the first time through. Users can also rerun all steps after a given point in the flow. This works because Lyza saves the intermediate data sets. It means that analysts can efficiently explore changes or extend an existing project without waiting for the entire flow to re-execute. It’s not as nice as running everything on a lightning-fast data server, but most analysts would find it gives them all the power they need.

As a point of comparison, loading that same 400 MB CSV file took almost 11 minutes with QlikView. I had forgotten how slowly QlikView loads text files, particularly on my limited CPU. On the other hand, loading a 100 MB Excel spreadsheet took about 90 seconds for Lyza vs. 13 seconds in QlikView. QlikView also compressed the 400 MB to 22 MB on disk and about 50 MB in memory, whereas Lyza more than doubled data to 960 MB of disk, due mostly to indexes. Memory consumption in Lyza rose only about 10 MB.

Of course, compression ratios for both QlikView and Lyza depend greatly on the nature of the data. This particular set had lots of blanks and Y/N fields. The result was much more compression than I usually see in QlikView and, I suspect, more expansion than usual in Lyza. In general, Lyza seems to make little use of data compression, which is usually a key advantage of columnar databases. Although this seems like a problem today, it also means there's an obvious opportunity for improvement as the system finds itself dealing with larger data sets.

What I think this boils down to is that Lyza can effectively handle multi-gigabyte data volumes on a desktop system. The only reason I’m not being more definite is I did see a lot of pauses, most accompanied by 100% CPU utilization, and occasional spikes in memory usage that I could only resolve by closing the software and, once or twice, by rebooting. This happened when I was working with small files as well as the large ones. It might have been the auto-save function, my old hardware, crowded disk drives, or Windows XP. On the other hand, Lyza is a young product (released September 2008) with only a dozen or so clients, so bugs would not be surprising. I'm certainly not ready to say Lyza doesn't have them.

Tracking down bugs will be harder because Lyza also runs on Linux and Mac systems. In fact, judging by the Mac-like interface, I suspect it wasn't developed on a Windows platform. According to Davis, performance isn’t very sensitive to adding memory beyond 1 GB, but high speed disk drives do help once you get past 10 million rows or so. The absolute limit on a 32 bit system is about 2 billion rows, a constraint related to addressable memory space (2^31 = about 2 billion) rather than anything peculiar to Lyza. Lyza can also run on 64 bit servers and is certified on Intel multi-core systems.

Enough about scalability. I haven’t done justice to Lyza’s interface, which is quite good. Most actions involve dragging objects into place, whether to add a new step to a process flow, move a field from one flow stage to the next, or drop measures and dimensions onto a report layout. Being able to see the data and reports instantly is tremendously helpful when building a complex processing flow, particularly if you’re exploring the data or trying to understand a problem at the same time. This is exactly how most analysts work.

Lyza also provides basic statistical functions including descriptive statistics, correlation and Z-test scores, a mean vs. standard deviation plot, and stepwise regression. This is nothing for SAS or SPSS to worry about; in fact, even Excel has more options. But it’s enough for most purposes. Similarly, data visualization is limited compared to a Tableau or ADVIZOR, but allows some interactive analysis and is more than adequate for day-to-day purposes.

Users can combine several reports onto a single dashboard, adding titles and effects similar to a Powerpoint slide. The report remains connected to the original workflow but doesn’t update automatically when the flow is rerun.

Intriguingly, Lyza can also display the lineage of a table or chart value. It traces the data from its source through all subsequent workflow steps, listing any transformations or selections applied along the way. Davis sees this as quickly answering the ever-popular question, “Where did that number come from?” Presumably this will leave more time to discuss American Idol.


Users can also link one workflow to another by simply dragging an object onto a new worksheet. This is a very powerful feature, since it lets users break big workflows into pieces and lets one workflow feed data into several others. The company has just taken this one step further by adding a collaboration server, Lyza Commons, that lets different users share workflows and reports. Reports show which users send and receive data from other users, as well as which data sets send and receive information from other data sets.

Those reports are more than just neat: they're documenting data flows that are otherwise lost in the “shadow IT” which exists outside of formal systems in most organizations. Combined with lineage tracing, this is where IT departments and auditors should start to find Lyza really interesting.

A future version of Commons will also let non-Lyza users view Lyza reports over the Web – further extending Lyza beyond the analyst’s personal desktop to be an enterprise resource. Add in the 64-bit capability, an API to call Lyza from other systems, and some other tricks the company isn’t ready to discuss in public, and there’s potential here to be much more than a productivity tool for analysts.

This brings us back to pricing. If you were reading closely, you noticed that little comment about Lyza being priced under $1,000. Actually there are two versions: a $199 Lyza Lite that only loads from Microsoft Excel, Access and text files, and the $899 regular version that can also connect to standard relational databases and other ODBC sources and includes the API.

This isn’t quite as cheap as it sounds because these are one year subscriptions. But even so, it is an entry cost well below the several tens of thousands of dollars you’d pay to get started with full versions of QlikView or ADVIZOR, and even a little cheaper than Tableau. The strategy of using analysts’ desktop as a beachhead is obvious, but that doesn’t make it any less effective.

So, should my friends at QlikView be worried? Not right away – QlikView is a vastly more mature product with many features and capabilities that Lyza doesn’t match, and probably can’t unless it switches to an in-memory database. But analysts are QlikView’s beachhead too, and there’s probably not enough room on their desktops for both systems. With a much lower entry price and enough scalability, data manipulation and analysis features to meet analysts’ basic needs, Lyza could be the easier one to pick. And that would make QlikView's growth much harder.

----------------------------

*ADVIZOR Solutions and Tableau Software have excellent visualization with an in-memory database, although they’re not so scalable. PivotLink, Birst and LucidEra are on-demand systems that are highly scalable, although their visualization is less sophisticated. Here are links to my reviews: ADVIZOR , Tableau, PivotLink, Birst and LucidEra.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in analysis systems, business intelligence software, columnar database, data mining, in-memory database, on-demand software | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • eBay Offers $2.4 Billion for GSI Commerce: More Support for Marketing Automation
    eBay ’s $2.4 billion offer for e-commerce services giant GSI Commerce has been described largely in terms of helping eBay to compete with ...
  • Infer Keeps It Simple: B2B Lead Scores and Nothing Else
    I’ve nearly finished gathering information from vendors for my new study on Customer Data Platform systems and have started to look for patt...
  • NICE Buys Causata to Extend Its Customer Experience Management Position
    So, there I was around 7:30 Eastern time this morning, sending out reminder notices to vendors I need to interview for an upcoming report on...
  • thinkAnalytics Helps Marketers Optimize Customer Treatments
    Summary: thinkAnalytics provides a robust decision engine to help make optimal recommendations across channels. Too bad more people don...
  • Selligent Brings a New B2C Marketing Automation Option to the U.S.
    I’m writing this post on my old DOS-based WordPerfect software, to get in the proper mood for discussing business-to-consumer marketing auto...
  • So Many Measures, So Little Time
    I’ve been collating lists of marketing performance metrics from different sources, which is exactly as much fun as it sounds. One result th...
  • 4 Marketing Tech Trends To Watch in 2014
    I'm not a big fan of year-end summaries and forecasts, mostly because I produce summaries and forecasts all year round.  But I pulled to...
  • Marketo Raises Another $50 Million: Where Does the Money Go?
    Marketo this morning announced a new $50 million funding round, almost exactly one year to the day after raising $25 million in November 2...
  • James Taylor on His New Book
    A few months ago, James Taylor of Fair Isaac asked me to look over a proof of Smart (Enough) Systems , a book he has co-written with indust...
  • Vocus Marketing Suite: Still Mostly Social But Marketing Automation is On the Way
    If you’ve heard of Vocus at all, it’s probably as vendor serving public relations professionals. Its core offerings include a huge databas...

Categories

  • [x+1]
  • 1010Data
  • 2009 trends
  • 2010 predictions
  • 2011 predictions
  • 2013 marketing automation revenues
  • 2014 predictions
  • account data in marketing systems
  • acquisitions
  • acquistions
  • act-on software
  • active conversion
  • activeconversion
  • acxiom
  • ad agencies
  • ad servers
  • adam needles
  • adobe
  • adometry
  • advertising effectiveness
  • advocate management
  • affiliate marketing
  • agilone
  • aida model
  • aimatch
  • algorithmic attribution
  • alterian
  • analysis systems
  • analytical database
  • analytical databases
  • analytical systems
  • analytics tools
  • app exchange
  • app marketplace
  • application design
  • aprimo
  • are
  • artificial intelligence
  • ascend2
  • asset management
  • assetlink
  • atg
  • attribution analysis
  • attribution models
  • automated decisions
  • automated dialog
  • automated modeling
  • autonomy
  • b2b demand generation
  • b2b demand generation systems
  • b2b email marketing benchmarks
  • b2b lead scoring
  • b2b marketing
  • b2b marketing automation
  • b2b marketing automation industry consolidation
  • b2b marketing automation industry growth rate
  • b2b marketing automation revenues
  • b2b marketing automation systems
  • b2b marketing automation vendor rankings
  • b2b marketing data
  • b2b marketing industry consolidation
  • b2b marketing strategy
  • b2b marketing system comparison
  • b2c marketing automation
  • b2c marketing automation vendors
  • balanced scorecard
  • balihoo
  • barriers to marketing success
  • barry devlin
  • beanstalk data
  • behavior detection
  • behavior identification
  • behavior targeting
  • behavioral data
  • behavioral targeting
  • big data
  • birst
  • bislr
  • blogging software
  • brand experience
  • brand marketing
  • business intelligence
  • business intelligence software
  • business intelligence systems
  • business marketing
  • businses case
  • callidus
  • campaign flow
  • campaign management
  • campaign management software
  • causata
  • cdi
  • cdp
  • channel management
  • channel marketing
  • channel partner management
  • chordiant
  • cio priorities
  • clickdimensions
  • clicksquared
  • clientxclient
  • cloud computing
  • cmo surveys
  • cms
  • collaboration software
  • column data store
  • column-oriented database
  • columnar database
  • community management
  • compare marketing automation vendors
  • compiled data
  • complex event processing
  • consumer marketing
  • contact center systems
  • content aggregation
  • content distribution
  • content grazing
  • content management
  • content marketing
  • content matrix
  • content recommendations
  • content selections
  • content syndication
  • context automation
  • conversen
  • coremetrics
  • crm
  • crm integration
  • CRM lead scores
  • crm software
  • crm systems
  • crmevolution
  • cross-channel marketing
  • crowd sourcing
  • custom content
  • custom media
  • customer database
  • customer analysis
  • customer data
  • customer data integration
  • customer data management
  • customer data platform
  • customer data platforms
  • customer data quality
  • customer data warehouse
  • customer database
  • customer experience
  • customer experience management
  • customer experience matrix
  • customer information
  • customer management
  • customer management software
  • customer management systems
  • customer metrics
  • customer relationship management
  • customer satisfaction
  • customer success
  • customer support
  • cxc matrix
  • dashboards
  • data analysis
  • data cleaning
  • data cleansing
  • data enhancement
  • data integration
  • data loading
  • data mining
  • data mining and terrorism
  • data quality
  • data transformation tools
  • data visualization
  • data warehouse
  • database management
  • database marketing
  • database marketing systems
  • database technology
  • dataflux
  • datallegro
  • datamentors
  • david raab
  • david raab webinar
  • david raab whitepaper
  • day software
  • decision engiens
  • decision engines
  • decision management
  • decision science
  • dell
  • demand generation
  • demand generation implementation
  • demand generation industry
  • demand generation industry growth rate
  • demand generation industry size
  • demand generation industry trends
  • demand generation marketbright
  • demand generation marketing automation
  • demand generation software
  • demand generation software revenues
  • demand generation systems
  • demand generation vendors
  • demandforce
  • digiday
  • digital marketing
  • digital marketing systems
  • digital messaging
  • distributed marketing
  • dmp
  • dreamforce
  • dreamforce 2012
  • dynamic content
  • ease of use
  • ebay
  • eglue
  • eloqua
  • eloqua10
  • elqoua ipo
  • email
  • email marketing
  • email service providers
  • engagement engine
  • enteprise marketing management
  • enterprise decision management
  • enterprise marketing management
  • enterprise software
  • entiera
  • epiphany
  • ETL
  • eTrigue
  • event detection
  • event stream processing
  • event-based marketing
  • exacttarget
  • facebook
  • feature checklists
  • flow charts
  • fractional attribution
  • freemium
  • future of marketing automation
  • g2crowd
  • gainsight
  • Genius.com
  • genoo
  • geotargeting
  • gleanster
  • governance
  • grosocial
  • gsi commerce
  • high performance analytics
  • hiring consultants
  • hosted software
  • hosted systems
  • hubspot
  • ibm
  • impact of internet on selling
  • importance of sales execution
  • in-memory database
  • in-site search
  • inbound marketing
  • industry consolidation
  • industry growth rate
  • industry size
  • industry trends
  • influitive
  • infor
  • information cards
  • infusioncon 2013
  • infusionsoft
  • innovation
  • integrated customer management
  • integrated marketing management
  • integrated marketing management systems
  • integrated marketing systems
  • integrated systems
  • intent measurement
  • interaction advisor
  • interaction management
  • interestbase
  • interwoven
  • intuit
  • IP address lookup
  • jbara
  • jesubi
  • king fish media
  • kwanzoo
  • kxen
  • kynetx
  • large company marketing automation
  • last click attribution
  • lead capture
  • lead generation
  • lead management
  • lead management software
  • lead management systems
  • lead managment
  • lead ranking
  • lead scoring
  • lead scoring models
  • leadforce1
  • leadformix
  • leading marketing automation systems
  • leadlander
  • leadlife
  • leadmd
  • leftbrain dga
  • lifecycle analysis
  • lifecycle reporting
  • lifetime value
  • lifetime value model
  • local marketing automation
  • loopfuse
  • low cost marketing software
  • low-cost marketing software
  • loyalty systems
  • lyzasoft
  • makesbridge
  • manticore technology
  • mapreduce
  • market consolidation
  • market software
  • market2lead
  • marketbight
  • marketbright
  • marketgenius
  • marketing analysis
  • marketing analytics
  • marketing and sales integration
  • marketing automation
  • marketing automation adoption
  • marketing automation benefits
  • marketing automation consolidation
  • marketing automation cost
  • marketing automation deployment
  • marketing automation features
  • marketing automation industry
  • marketing automation industry growth rate
  • marketing automation industry trends
  • marketing automation market share
  • marketing automation market size
  • marketing automation maturity model
  • marketing automation net promoter score. marketing automation effectiveness
  • marketing automation pricing
  • marketing automation software
  • marketing automation software evaluation
  • marketing automation success factors
  • marketing automation system deployment
  • marketing automation system evaluation
  • marketing automation system features
  • marketing automation system selection
  • marketing automation system usage
  • marketing automation systems
  • marketing automation trends
  • marketing automation user satisfaction
  • marketing automation vendor financials
  • marketing automation vendor selection
  • marketing automation vendor strategies
  • marketing automion
  • marketing best practices
  • marketing cloud
  • marketing content
  • marketing data
  • marketing data management
  • marketing database
  • marketing database management
  • marketing education
  • marketing execution
  • marketing funnel
  • marketing integration
  • marketing lead stages
  • marketing management
  • marketing measurement
  • marketing mix models
  • marketing operating system
  • marketing operations
  • marketing optimization
  • marketing performance
  • marketing performance measurement
  • marketing platforms
  • marketing priorities
  • marketing process
  • marketing process optimization
  • marketing resource management
  • marketing return on investment
  • marketing ROI
  • marketing sales alignment
  • marketing service providers
  • marketing services
  • marketing services providers
  • marketing skills gap
  • marketing software
  • marketing software evaluation
  • marketing software industry trends
  • marketing software product reviews
  • marketing software selection
  • marketing software trends
  • marketing softwware
  • marketing suites
  • marketing system architecture
  • marketing system evaluation
  • marketing system ROI
  • marketing system selection
  • marketing systems
  • marketing technology
  • marketing tests
  • marketing tips
  • marketing to sales alignment
  • marketing training
  • marketing trends
  • marketing-sales integration
  • marketingpilot
  • marketo
  • marketo funding
  • marketo ipo
  • master data management
  • matching
  • maturity model
  • meaning based marketing
  • media mix models
  • message customization
  • metrics
  • micro-business marketing software
  • microsoft
  • microsoft dynamics crm
  • mid-tier marketing systems
  • mindmatrix
  • mintigo
  • mma
  • mobile marketing
  • mpm toolkit
  • multi-channel marketing
  • multi-language marketing
  • multivariate testing
  • natural language processing
  • neolane
  • net promoter score
  • network link analysis
  • next best action
  • nice systems
  • nimble crm
  • number of clients
  • nurture programs
  • officeautopilot
  • omnichannel marketing
  • omniture
  • on-demand
  • on-demand business intelligence
  • on-demand software
  • on-premise software
  • online advertising
  • online advertising optimization
  • online analytics
  • online marketing
  • open source bi
  • open source software
  • optimization
  • optimove
  • oracle
  • paraccel
  • pardot
  • pardot acquisition
  • partner relationship management
  • pay per click
  • pay per response
  • pedowitz group
  • pegasystems
  • performable
  • performance marketing
  • personalization
  • pitney bowes
  • portrait software
  • predictive analytics
  • predictive lead scoring
  • predictive modeling
  • privacy
  • prospect database
  • prospecting
  • qliktech
  • qlikview
  • qlikview price
  • raab guide
  • raab report
  • raab survey
  • Raab VEST
  • Raab VEST report
  • raab webinar
  • reachedge
  • reachforce
  • real time decision management
  • real time interaction management
  • real-time decisions
  • real-time interaction management
  • realtime decisions
  • recommendation engines
  • relationship analysis
  • reporting software
  • request for proposal
  • reseller marketing automation
  • response attribution
  • revenue attribution
  • revenue generation
  • revenue performance management
  • rfm scores
  • rightnow
  • rightwave
  • roi reporting
  • role of experts
  • rule-based systems
  • saas software
  • saffron technology
  • sales automation
  • sales best practices
  • sales enablement
  • sales force automation
  • sales funnel
  • sales lead management association
  • sales leads
  • sales process
  • sales prospecting
  • salesforce acquires exacttarget
  • salesforce.com
  • salesgenius
  • sap
  • sas
  • score cards
  • search engine optimization
  • search engines
  • self-optimizing systems
  • selligent
  • semantic analysis
  • semantic analytics
  • sentiment analysis
  • service oriented architecture
  • setlogik
  • setlogik acquisition
  • silverpop
  • silverpop engage
  • silverpop engage b2b
  • simulation
  • sisense prismcubed
  • sitecore
  • small business marketing
  • small business software
  • smarter commerce
  • smartfocus
  • soa
  • social campaign management
  • social crm
  • social marketing
  • social marketing automation
  • social marketing management
  • social media
  • social media marketing
  • social media measurement
  • social media monitoring
  • social media roi
  • social network data
  • software as a service
  • software costs
  • software deployment
  • software evaluation
  • software satisfaction
  • software selection
  • software usability
  • software usability measurement
  • Spredfast
  • stage-based measurement
  • state-based systems
  • surveillance technology
  • sweet suite
  • swyft
  • sybase iq
  • system deployment
  • system design
  • system implementation
  • system requirements
  • system selection
  • tableau software
  • technology infrastructure
  • techrigy
  • Tenbase
  • teradata
  • test design
  • text analysis
  • training
  • treehouse international
  • trigger marketing
  • twitter
  • unica
  • universal behaviors
  • unstructured data
  • usability assessment
  • user interface
  • vendor comparison
  • vendor evaluation
  • vendor evaluation comparison
  • vendor rankings
  • vendor selection
  • vendor services
  • venntive
  • vertica
  • visualiq
  • vocus
  • vtrenz
  • web analytics
  • web contact management
  • Web content management
  • web data analysis
  • web marketing
  • web personalization
  • Web site design
  • whatsnexx
  • woopra
  • youcalc
  • zoho
  • zoomix

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (55)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2012 (56)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2011 (74)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2010 (75)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ▼  2009 (96)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ▼  April (11)
      • New Webinars and White Paper
      • Demand Generation Implementation Survey: Half of U...
      • Demand Generation Implementation Survey - Backgrou...
      • Demand Generation Implementation -- Take My Survey...
      • Lyzasoft: Independence for Analysts and Maybe Some...
      • LeadLife Mixes Advanced and Simple Features
      • PivotLink: Flexible On-Demand Business Intelligence
      • Good Look at QlikView from a Microstrategy Consult...
      • Pedowitz Group Offers Free Support for New Eloqua ...
      • True Influence Opens a Window into Future Demand G...
      • DemandBase Creeps Up the Value Chain
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (11)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2008 (59)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2007 (84)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (16)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (20)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile