Marketing Deal Offers

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg
Showing posts with label marketing automation industry trends. Show all posts
Showing posts with label marketing automation industry trends. Show all posts

Tuesday, 6 August 2013

How RightWave Solves the Marketing Automation Skill Shortage

Posted on 20:33 by Unknown
One of the main reasons that marketing automation has not been adopted more quickly is that too few marketers know how to fully use it. For example, a recent Gleanster report found that 73% of top performers listed lack of skilled staff as one of the top challenges to success. Marketing automation vendors have adopted different strategies to deal with their problem, including making their systems easier to use, offering extensive training, and providing services to run the systems for their clients.

RightWave has taken that final option to an extreme: it doesn’t even give clients the option of running the system for themselves. Instead, RightWave offers what it calls “marketing automation as a service,” gives each client access to staff members who will set up and execute campaigns for them.  There’s nothing especially new about marketing service providers offering this type of service, but  RightWave does it at a price point – starting as low as $60,000 per year – that is comparable to what a good-sized company would pay for most marketing automation systems alone. Because RightWave charges are based on staff resources -- $5,000 per month buys one-half a full time equivalent person, and $8,000 buyers one full time equivalent, fees don't rise for bigger databases or higher message volume.  This means it could actually be cheaper than a self-service system for big companies.

It’s a little hard to review software that isn’t used by its buyers.  Still, the vendor comparison in our VEST report shows that RightWave’s core functionality – for lead generation, campaign management, scoring and distribution, and reporting – is on par with mid-tier leaders Pardot and Marketo.  Where it loses are usability and pricing, but only because it doesn't fit the scoring model: usability suffers from lack of training services which RightWave clients don’t need, and pricing is penalized by the high starting cost which doesn't take into account the lower cost at high volumes.


In other words, RightWave has the features to support pretty much any program marketers might want. More important, RightWave clients are more likely to actually run sophisticated programs because the RightWave staff will build them without the clients needing to learn how. RightWave staff also helps with data quality and analytics, two other areas where many marketing departments lack expertise.


RightWave actually does let marketers import files, create segmentations, and build emails, although few clients do these for themselves.  What clients do use are extensive reporting tools that show marketing calendars, campaign results, customer profiles, Web tracking reports, funnel analysis, return on investment, and other information. The system also gives sales users reports on new leads, activities of existing leads, and visits from target accounts.  Most of the sales information is presented within the Salesforce.com interface, although users can drill down into details held with RightWave.

The details of RightWave functionality are less important than the appeal of its fundamental business model. After seven years of development, the company has about twenty clients.  This sounds considerably short of setting the world on fire, but it really reflects intentionally slow growth as the product matured. Company founder Anurag Khemka, who also started an earlier generation B2C marketing automation system MarketFirst in 1996, said he’s found it relatively easy to sell the system to senior managers, but sometimes run into resistance from lower level staff who want to gain hands-on experience. The company is now starting to ramp up its sales efforts, so the true scope of its appeal will soon be clear. I’ll be watching with great interest.












Read More
Posted in b2b marketing automation, marketing automation adoption, marketing automation industry trends, rightwave | No comments

Tuesday, 18 December 2012

Future of Marketing Automation: Grow or Die

Posted on 07:20 by Unknown
‘Tis the season for industry predictions. I’ve already fielded a couple of requests for my thoughts, which usually requires some pondering before I reply. But this time I was able to answer right away because I’ve just finished a white paper on the future of B2B marketing automation, sponsored by Leadformix and available here for free download.



The question answered by the paper is “What will marketing automation vendors do next?” This is different from the perhaps-more-important question of “What will marketers do next?” I don’t claim any particularly deep insights into the latter: they'll continue to adapt to new media and buying habits, I guess. Like everyone else, I’m seeing greater use of social, mobile, and video; more cross-channel campaigns; closer cooperation between marketing and sales; and expanded use of analytics. If I had to predict one thing that isn’t utterly obvious, it's that B2B marketers will be more involved with managing customer relationships after the initial sale. The reason is that post-sales interactions are increasingly automated and marketers have the best tools to manage automated interactions effectively. The task is really the same as a sophisticated lead nurturing campaign: to monitor customer behavior and respond appropriately.

While my vision of future marketing may be rather broad, I think I see the future of marketing automation in clearer detail. This is what’s covered in the white paper. To summarize the argument:

  • marketing automation vendors must grow or die. Today’s B2B marketing automation systems are used primarily for lead nurturing. This means they don’t help other marketers who do lead acquisition and marketing administration (planning, budgeting, project management, etc.). They also have limited interactions with sales and service departments, who own the post-sales customer relationship. Marketing automation vendors who want to expand their business need to service these other groups or risk some other system becoming the central platform for marketing management. If that happens, the other systems will slowly encroach on marketing automation functionality and eventually replace it.
  • marketing automation can expand in either direction along the customer path: backward to acquisition or forward to sales and service.  Most expansion to date has been towards sales, in the form of add-ons that give salespeople access to information about behavior of their leads. But CRM systems are deeply embedded in sales departments, so they block growth in that direction.  I therefore expect marketing automation vendors to instead shift toward features for acquisition marketers. These would include not just “inbound marketing” through social media and search engine optimization, but also purchasing media such as online and offline advertising.
  • marketing automation can also be divided into layers of delivery systems, campaign management, and platform functions.  Delivery systems manage touchpoints such as Web sites, email, and social media publishing.  Campaign management is the rules and models to select names for promotions.  Platform functions are supporting technologies such as the marketing database, planning and budgeting, content management, analytics, and security. Current marketing automation systems do all three to the degree needed for lead nurture campaigns.  Extending to other users will require more powerful platform functions in particular. Whoever controls the platform can best expand throughout the marketing department.
  • marketing automation vendors will increasingly fall into two groups: a handful of big platform vendors and larger number of small specialists. The platform vendors will offer a broad range of functions internally and further extend their range by exposing their platforms to third party developers through “app markets”. The specialists will have narrower scope but be very good at serving companies with specific needs such as low cost, marketing services, or  industry editions (for sports, investments, franchises, etc.)  Both types of companies can succeed although the platform vendors will tend to dominate over time.
  • new competition will come from outside the industry, especially from delivery systems. This seems counter-intuitive: delivery systems are by definition channel-specific and function-generic (a term I just invented to mean they serve all functions within marketing, sales and service). This means they are in the strategically weak position of selling commodity products without strong ties to any particular set of users. But the delivery vendors recognize this weakness and can afford to overcome it by investing in campaign engines and platform features. This is exactly what's happening when email vendor ExactTarget purchases Pardot or Web content management vendor SiteCore adds email campaigns and a database. It (almost) goes without saying that CRM vendors are also potential competitors: they already have the platform features; what they mostly lack are campaign engines.
These trends have specific implications for marketers who are selecting a marketing automation system.  You'll need to download the white paper to find out what they are.
Read More
Posted in campaign management, crm systems, future of marketing automation, leadformix, marketing automation industry trends, marketing platforms | No comments

Thursday, 2 August 2012

Raab Report: Financial Comparison of B2B Marketing Automation Vendors

Posted on 19:58 by Unknown
I’ve been so busy analyzing the new VEST data that I missed the announcement that Eloqua’s would make its initial stock offering today. The valuation was a bit disappointing – $368 million, or just over four times revenue trailing 12-month revenue – but certainly a good return on its backers’ investment of about $41 million. And the stock did rise 12% on the first day. Good for them, and congratulations.

Coincidentally, I was already planning to write today about industry financials. I’ve been creeping in that direction with the previous two posts about revenues, growth rates, and market share. Now let’s plunge in with some more substantial analysis.

For companies like Eloqua and its competitors, there are really two big financial questions: how fast can they grow, and how can they become profitable? In a young industry like B2B marketing automation, the primary focus is growth, and I published some figures on that yesterday  (repeated below). As we saw, Eloqua’s client count is growing considerably slower* than all major competitors except Infusionsoft. This may be one reason the stock market gave it a relatively conservative valuation.



Revenue figures tell a similar story, as does revenue per client. We looked at those in Tuesday’s post;  I’ll repeat the caveat that figures for Eloqua and HubSpot are my own estimates based largely on client growth and (for HubSpot) changes in client mix. The standout performer in all these tables is Marketo, but bear in mind that they’ve also taken much more investment than any of the others ($107.5 million) and the $70 million in 2012 revenue hasn’t happened yet. Still, this suggests that Marketo might be able to fetch a higher price than Eloqua.



What about profitability? I’ll repeat that the financial markets care much less about profits than growth for early stage companies. Still, profits will have to matter eventually.  So they're worth a look.

Eloqua is the only company in this group with published financial statements, so any profitability analysis has to be speculative. One useful measure is employee counts, which are a reasonable proxy for expenses and operating efficiency. The table below presents clients, employees, and clients-per-employee ratios.



The first thing you’ll notice is the broad range in clients-per-employee ratios: from 40:1 for Infusionsoft to less than 4:1 for Eloqua. The main reason is the size of each company’s clients – Infusionsoft serves small businesses that take much less effort per client than the mid-size and large companies who buy Eloqua.

Still, Marketo, Pardot, SalesFusion and Net-Results all serve primarily mid-size companies, so they are somewhat comparable. (Act-On tends a bit smaller.) Given that assumption, the figures suggest that Pardot, Net-Results and SalesFusion are more efficient than the others. That’s probably true, perhaps because they are all self-funded. Net-Results also markets primarily through resellers, which also lowers its costs.  Act-On’s ratio is notably low, probably reflecting aggressive staffing as it prepares for rapid growth.

The second thing you’ll notice is the year-on-year trend. Infusionsoft, HubSpot, Act-On, and Net-Results all show a drop in the clients-per-employee ratio since last year, meaning they have become less efficient. We can probably attribute that to gearing up for growth. By contrast, Eloqua, Pardot and SalesFusion have become substantially more efficient. Eloqua’s gain is particularly impressive since it has the largest client base and relatively low growth – suggesting the company has been working hard to keep costs down in preparation for its public offering. It looks like Marketo has become just slightly more efficient, but we'll revise that opinion in a moment.

Since we do have revenue figures for the top four vendors, we can also look at their revenue per employee. This is a standard efficiency metric and more directly comparable across companies.  Here's that data, along with revenue per client.


These figures put the client-per-employee ratios in deeper perspective. They confirm that Eloqua has improved efficiency, and by far the highest revenue per employee in the industry.  The figures may be be overstated (see footnote) but even more conservative values would leave Eloqua in first place.  The figures also confirm that Infusionsoft’s cost structure is pretty much stable.

The news is better for HubSpot, whose apparent productivity decrease (measured in clients-per-employee) vanishes when you measure revenue per employee instead. The difference is the growth in revenue per client (which, I’ll remind you again, is only my personal estimate).

The story is even more dramatic for Marketo, whose 6% improvement in clients per employee becomes a 23% gain in revenue per employee, boosted by a 16% increase in revenue per client.  Impressive, but let's hold the applause until we see the actual results.


Whew, that’s a lot of numbers. Maybe only industry insiders will find them as interesting as I do. But other marketers should also find them helpful as they try to understand each vendor's business situation and determine how well it matches the marketer's own needs.

_________________________________________________________
* And that's using Eloqua-provided figures of 900 clients as of mid-2011 and 1,375 for mid-2012, which yield a 53% year-on-year growth rate.  The revised S-1 published in mid-July showed 42% year-on-year revenue growth.  A 42% growth rate would yield 2012 revenue of $101 million vs. my estimate of $110 million, and a 7% drop in revenue per customer to $73,455.  Ouch!  On the plus side, even the adjusted $288,571 revenue per employee is higher than anyone else, and a 16% improvement over 2011.

Read More
Posted in demand generation systems, marketing automation industry trends, marketing automation vendor financials, marketing software selection | No comments
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • 4 Marketing Tech Trends To Watch in 2014
    I'm not a big fan of year-end summaries and forecasts, mostly because I produce summaries and forecasts all year round.  But I pulled to...
  • Gainsight Gives Customer Success Managers a Database of Their Own
    I had a conversation last week with a vendor whose pitch was all about providing execution systems with a shared database that contains a un...
  • Salesforce.com and Oracle Buy Social Marketing Systems: Not the End of Marketing As We Know It
    Salesforce.com yesterday announced agreement to buy social media publishing vendor Buddy Media for $689 million, thereby adding another b...
  • Treehouse Interactive MarketingView Combines Demand Generation with Campaign ROI Tracking
    I originally spoke with Treehouse Interactive in late January, but didn’t write about them because weren’t quite ready to talk about their ...
  • Infer Keeps It Simple: B2B Lead Scores and Nothing Else
    I’ve nearly finished gathering information from vendors for my new study on Customer Data Platform systems and have started to look for patt...
  • NurtureHQ Offers "Dead Easy Marketing Automation". Is That Enough?
    I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. New-ish marketing automation vendor NurtureHQ showed me its product recently. It’s really nice. Cl...
  • Marketing Automation News from Dreamforce: B2B More Integrated, B2C Stays Separate
    I spent the early part of this week at Salesforce.com ’s annual Dreamforce conference. Here are my observations. The big news was for geeks...
  • OfficeAutoPilot: Simple, Powerful, Low Cost Demand Generation for Small Business
    My personal definition of demand generations systems (see Introduction to Demand Generation Systems from the Raab Guide site) explicitly st...
  • Mintigo InterestBase Harvests Web and Social Data for Marketing and Sales
    Every marketer recognizes that the Web and social media could be rich sources of information about customers and prospects. But harvesting...
  • First Look at New Marketo Release
    I’m going to diverge just slightly from my current obsession with usability to talk about a conversation I had today with Marketo President...

Categories

  • [x+1]
  • 1010Data
  • 2009 trends
  • 2010 predictions
  • 2011 predictions
  • 2013 marketing automation revenues
  • 2014 predictions
  • account data in marketing systems
  • acquisitions
  • acquistions
  • act-on software
  • active conversion
  • activeconversion
  • acxiom
  • ad agencies
  • ad servers
  • adam needles
  • adobe
  • adometry
  • advertising effectiveness
  • advocate management
  • affiliate marketing
  • agilone
  • aida model
  • aimatch
  • algorithmic attribution
  • alterian
  • analysis systems
  • analytical database
  • analytical databases
  • analytical systems
  • analytics tools
  • app exchange
  • app marketplace
  • application design
  • aprimo
  • are
  • artificial intelligence
  • ascend2
  • asset management
  • assetlink
  • atg
  • attribution analysis
  • attribution models
  • automated decisions
  • automated dialog
  • automated modeling
  • autonomy
  • b2b demand generation
  • b2b demand generation systems
  • b2b email marketing benchmarks
  • b2b lead scoring
  • b2b marketing
  • b2b marketing automation
  • b2b marketing automation industry consolidation
  • b2b marketing automation industry growth rate
  • b2b marketing automation revenues
  • b2b marketing automation systems
  • b2b marketing automation vendor rankings
  • b2b marketing data
  • b2b marketing industry consolidation
  • b2b marketing strategy
  • b2b marketing system comparison
  • b2c marketing automation
  • b2c marketing automation vendors
  • balanced scorecard
  • balihoo
  • barriers to marketing success
  • barry devlin
  • beanstalk data
  • behavior detection
  • behavior identification
  • behavior targeting
  • behavioral data
  • behavioral targeting
  • big data
  • birst
  • bislr
  • blogging software
  • brand experience
  • brand marketing
  • business intelligence
  • business intelligence software
  • business intelligence systems
  • business marketing
  • businses case
  • callidus
  • campaign flow
  • campaign management
  • campaign management software
  • causata
  • cdi
  • cdp
  • channel management
  • channel marketing
  • channel partner management
  • chordiant
  • cio priorities
  • clickdimensions
  • clicksquared
  • clientxclient
  • cloud computing
  • cmo surveys
  • cms
  • collaboration software
  • column data store
  • column-oriented database
  • columnar database
  • community management
  • compare marketing automation vendors
  • compiled data
  • complex event processing
  • consumer marketing
  • contact center systems
  • content aggregation
  • content distribution
  • content grazing
  • content management
  • content marketing
  • content matrix
  • content recommendations
  • content selections
  • content syndication
  • context automation
  • conversen
  • coremetrics
  • crm
  • crm integration
  • CRM lead scores
  • crm software
  • crm systems
  • crmevolution
  • cross-channel marketing
  • crowd sourcing
  • custom content
  • custom media
  • customer database
  • customer analysis
  • customer data
  • customer data integration
  • customer data management
  • customer data platform
  • customer data platforms
  • customer data quality
  • customer data warehouse
  • customer database
  • customer experience
  • customer experience management
  • customer experience matrix
  • customer information
  • customer management
  • customer management software
  • customer management systems
  • customer metrics
  • customer relationship management
  • customer satisfaction
  • customer success
  • customer support
  • cxc matrix
  • dashboards
  • data analysis
  • data cleaning
  • data cleansing
  • data enhancement
  • data integration
  • data loading
  • data mining
  • data mining and terrorism
  • data quality
  • data transformation tools
  • data visualization
  • data warehouse
  • database management
  • database marketing
  • database marketing systems
  • database technology
  • dataflux
  • datallegro
  • datamentors
  • david raab
  • david raab webinar
  • david raab whitepaper
  • day software
  • decision engiens
  • decision engines
  • decision management
  • decision science
  • dell
  • demand generation
  • demand generation implementation
  • demand generation industry
  • demand generation industry growth rate
  • demand generation industry size
  • demand generation industry trends
  • demand generation marketbright
  • demand generation marketing automation
  • demand generation software
  • demand generation software revenues
  • demand generation systems
  • demand generation vendors
  • demandforce
  • digiday
  • digital marketing
  • digital marketing systems
  • digital messaging
  • distributed marketing
  • dmp
  • dreamforce
  • dreamforce 2012
  • dynamic content
  • ease of use
  • ebay
  • eglue
  • eloqua
  • eloqua10
  • elqoua ipo
  • email
  • email marketing
  • email service providers
  • engagement engine
  • enteprise marketing management
  • enterprise decision management
  • enterprise marketing management
  • enterprise software
  • entiera
  • epiphany
  • ETL
  • eTrigue
  • event detection
  • event stream processing
  • event-based marketing
  • exacttarget
  • facebook
  • feature checklists
  • flow charts
  • fractional attribution
  • freemium
  • future of marketing automation
  • g2crowd
  • gainsight
  • Genius.com
  • genoo
  • geotargeting
  • gleanster
  • governance
  • grosocial
  • gsi commerce
  • high performance analytics
  • hiring consultants
  • hosted software
  • hosted systems
  • hubspot
  • ibm
  • impact of internet on selling
  • importance of sales execution
  • in-memory database
  • in-site search
  • inbound marketing
  • industry consolidation
  • industry growth rate
  • industry size
  • industry trends
  • influitive
  • infor
  • information cards
  • infusioncon 2013
  • infusionsoft
  • innovation
  • integrated customer management
  • integrated marketing management
  • integrated marketing management systems
  • integrated marketing systems
  • integrated systems
  • intent measurement
  • interaction advisor
  • interaction management
  • interestbase
  • interwoven
  • intuit
  • IP address lookup
  • jbara
  • jesubi
  • king fish media
  • kwanzoo
  • kxen
  • kynetx
  • large company marketing automation
  • last click attribution
  • lead capture
  • lead generation
  • lead management
  • lead management software
  • lead management systems
  • lead managment
  • lead ranking
  • lead scoring
  • lead scoring models
  • leadforce1
  • leadformix
  • leading marketing automation systems
  • leadlander
  • leadlife
  • leadmd
  • leftbrain dga
  • lifecycle analysis
  • lifecycle reporting
  • lifetime value
  • lifetime value model
  • local marketing automation
  • loopfuse
  • low cost marketing software
  • low-cost marketing software
  • loyalty systems
  • lyzasoft
  • makesbridge
  • manticore technology
  • mapreduce
  • market consolidation
  • market software
  • market2lead
  • marketbight
  • marketbright
  • marketgenius
  • marketing analysis
  • marketing analytics
  • marketing and sales integration
  • marketing automation
  • marketing automation adoption
  • marketing automation benefits
  • marketing automation consolidation
  • marketing automation cost
  • marketing automation deployment
  • marketing automation features
  • marketing automation industry
  • marketing automation industry growth rate
  • marketing automation industry trends
  • marketing automation market share
  • marketing automation market size
  • marketing automation maturity model
  • marketing automation net promoter score. marketing automation effectiveness
  • marketing automation pricing
  • marketing automation software
  • marketing automation software evaluation
  • marketing automation success factors
  • marketing automation system deployment
  • marketing automation system evaluation
  • marketing automation system features
  • marketing automation system selection
  • marketing automation system usage
  • marketing automation systems
  • marketing automation trends
  • marketing automation user satisfaction
  • marketing automation vendor financials
  • marketing automation vendor selection
  • marketing automation vendor strategies
  • marketing automion
  • marketing best practices
  • marketing cloud
  • marketing content
  • marketing data
  • marketing data management
  • marketing database
  • marketing database management
  • marketing education
  • marketing execution
  • marketing funnel
  • marketing integration
  • marketing lead stages
  • marketing management
  • marketing measurement
  • marketing mix models
  • marketing operating system
  • marketing operations
  • marketing optimization
  • marketing performance
  • marketing performance measurement
  • marketing platforms
  • marketing priorities
  • marketing process
  • marketing process optimization
  • marketing resource management
  • marketing return on investment
  • marketing ROI
  • marketing sales alignment
  • marketing service providers
  • marketing services
  • marketing services providers
  • marketing skills gap
  • marketing software
  • marketing software evaluation
  • marketing software industry trends
  • marketing software product reviews
  • marketing software selection
  • marketing software trends
  • marketing softwware
  • marketing suites
  • marketing system architecture
  • marketing system evaluation
  • marketing system ROI
  • marketing system selection
  • marketing systems
  • marketing technology
  • marketing tests
  • marketing tips
  • marketing to sales alignment
  • marketing training
  • marketing trends
  • marketing-sales integration
  • marketingpilot
  • marketo
  • marketo funding
  • marketo ipo
  • master data management
  • matching
  • maturity model
  • meaning based marketing
  • media mix models
  • message customization
  • metrics
  • micro-business marketing software
  • microsoft
  • microsoft dynamics crm
  • mid-tier marketing systems
  • mindmatrix
  • mintigo
  • mma
  • mobile marketing
  • mpm toolkit
  • multi-channel marketing
  • multi-language marketing
  • multivariate testing
  • natural language processing
  • neolane
  • net promoter score
  • network link analysis
  • next best action
  • nice systems
  • nimble crm
  • number of clients
  • nurture programs
  • officeautopilot
  • omnichannel marketing
  • omniture
  • on-demand
  • on-demand business intelligence
  • on-demand software
  • on-premise software
  • online advertising
  • online advertising optimization
  • online analytics
  • online marketing
  • open source bi
  • open source software
  • optimization
  • optimove
  • oracle
  • paraccel
  • pardot
  • pardot acquisition
  • partner relationship management
  • pay per click
  • pay per response
  • pedowitz group
  • pegasystems
  • performable
  • performance marketing
  • personalization
  • pitney bowes
  • portrait software
  • predictive analytics
  • predictive lead scoring
  • predictive modeling
  • privacy
  • prospect database
  • prospecting
  • qliktech
  • qlikview
  • qlikview price
  • raab guide
  • raab report
  • raab survey
  • Raab VEST
  • Raab VEST report
  • raab webinar
  • reachedge
  • reachforce
  • real time decision management
  • real time interaction management
  • real-time decisions
  • real-time interaction management
  • realtime decisions
  • recommendation engines
  • relationship analysis
  • reporting software
  • request for proposal
  • reseller marketing automation
  • response attribution
  • revenue attribution
  • revenue generation
  • revenue performance management
  • rfm scores
  • rightnow
  • rightwave
  • roi reporting
  • role of experts
  • rule-based systems
  • saas software
  • saffron technology
  • sales automation
  • sales best practices
  • sales enablement
  • sales force automation
  • sales funnel
  • sales lead management association
  • sales leads
  • sales process
  • sales prospecting
  • salesforce acquires exacttarget
  • salesforce.com
  • salesgenius
  • sap
  • sas
  • score cards
  • search engine optimization
  • search engines
  • self-optimizing systems
  • selligent
  • semantic analysis
  • semantic analytics
  • sentiment analysis
  • service oriented architecture
  • setlogik
  • setlogik acquisition
  • silverpop
  • silverpop engage
  • silverpop engage b2b
  • simulation
  • sisense prismcubed
  • sitecore
  • small business marketing
  • small business software
  • smarter commerce
  • smartfocus
  • soa
  • social campaign management
  • social crm
  • social marketing
  • social marketing automation
  • social marketing management
  • social media
  • social media marketing
  • social media measurement
  • social media monitoring
  • social media roi
  • social network data
  • software as a service
  • software costs
  • software deployment
  • software evaluation
  • software satisfaction
  • software selection
  • software usability
  • software usability measurement
  • Spredfast
  • stage-based measurement
  • state-based systems
  • surveillance technology
  • sweet suite
  • swyft
  • sybase iq
  • system deployment
  • system design
  • system implementation
  • system requirements
  • system selection
  • tableau software
  • technology infrastructure
  • techrigy
  • Tenbase
  • teradata
  • test design
  • text analysis
  • training
  • treehouse international
  • trigger marketing
  • twitter
  • unica
  • universal behaviors
  • unstructured data
  • usability assessment
  • user interface
  • vendor comparison
  • vendor evaluation
  • vendor evaluation comparison
  • vendor rankings
  • vendor selection
  • vendor services
  • venntive
  • vertica
  • visualiq
  • vocus
  • vtrenz
  • web analytics
  • web contact management
  • Web content management
  • web data analysis
  • web marketing
  • web personalization
  • Web site design
  • whatsnexx
  • woopra
  • youcalc
  • zoho
  • zoomix

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (55)
    • ▼  December (4)
      • 4 Marketing Tech Trends To Watch in 2014
      • Webinar, December 18: How Marketers Can (Finally) ...
      • Woopra Grows from Web Analytics to Multi-Source Cu...
      • Optimove Helps Optimize Customer Retention (And, Y...
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2012 (56)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2011 (74)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2010 (75)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2009 (96)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (11)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2008 (59)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2007 (84)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (16)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (20)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile